Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Could Wind Turbines Be Toxic To The Ear?

A maintenance worker looks out over an off-shore wind farm in Liverpool, England in 2008. Some people are concerned about the potential health effects of noise from wind turbines.

Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

A maintenance worker looks out over an off-shore wind farm in Liverpool, England in 2008. Some people are concerned about the potential health effects of noise from wind turbines.

Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

The U.S. is embracing wind energy, with wind turbines making up half of the new electricity added to the power grid last year. But a smattering of people who live near the turbines say they're a nuisance ? and making them ill.

Dr. Nina Pierpont, a Johns Hopkins-trained pediatrician and biologist in upstate New York, has been collecting their anecdotes for years. She coined the term wind turbine syndrome to encompass the symptoms of headaches, dizziness, tinnitus, ear pain, and difficulty sleeping that people in several states and countries have complained of ? largely on the Internet. And she says she's convinced the culprit is the low frequency noise, called infrasound, from the turbines and how it's disturbing the delicate vestibular system of the inner ear.

The claims of the existence of wind turbine syndrome have been met with heavy skepticism from a host of experts in energy and public health since few studies aside from one self-published report from Pierpont have shown any link between the turbines and health. The World Health Organization, which classifies diseases, does not recognize wind turbine syndrome, nor does any other medical institution. And otolaryngologists, who are experts on ear health, have remained largely silent on the issue.

Until now.

A recent study by ear, nose and throat specialists in the U.K. found that infrasound can have physiological effects. The review article, published in the March issue of the Journal of Laryngology & Otology, showed that outer hair cells of the cochlea respond to infrasound, which could affect the functioning of the ear. Another study looked at how the auditory cortex of the brain can also be activated by low-frequency noise, which could produce health effects.

Dr. Amir Farboud, a senior surgical ear, nose and throat resident at Glan Clwyd Hospital in Rhyl, Wales and co-author of the review, says that he initially thought that wind turbine syndrome was "rubbish" when someone came into his office claiming to have it. But, over time, his opinion has changed. "The more you look into it, the more you realize there's some science behind this," he says.

However, Farboud cautions that there is no conclusive evidence that infrasound causes any specific symptoms.

"We think infrasound causes problems in the inner ear and we think wind turbines produce infrasound, but we can't stand up and put our hands on our hearts and say 'Wind turbines cause wind turbine syndrome,'" says Farboud. "The symptoms are just too vague. More research needs to be done."

Other researchers are much more skeptical, including Simon Chapman, a professor of public health at the University of Sydney. Chapman believes that wind turbine syndrome, which has been an especially contentious issue in Australia recently, is "probably an example of community panic."

Chapman says that the current concern over wind turbines fits a historic pattern of people distrusting any kind of new technology, ranging from televisions to cell phones to wi-fi.

In a study published in March on the University of Sydney's website, Chapman reports that only five of the 49 wind farms in Australia have ever drawn complaints, and that all five had been targets of anti-wind activism.

He also points out that, although wind turbines have been operating in Australia since 1993, over 80 percent of complaints arose after 2009, when anti-wind groups first began emphasizing the potential health hazards of wind turbines. (Chapman is planning on submitting his study for peer-review.)

Chapman and others have said that wind turbine syndrome is a result of the nocebo effect, in which merely suggesting that something could be harmful to your health causes it to be so.

He refers to a University of Auckland study, published this month in Health Psychology, which found that healthy volunteers were more likely to report symptoms after exposure to fake infrasound if they had been told beforehand about the potential health effects of such noise.

"I'm quite prepared to believe that there are many people who sincerely are experiencing symptoms," says Chapman. But he believes that those symptoms have a psychological rather than a physical basis.

In the meantime, we're likely to see more turbines dotting our skylines in the coming years. And if the possibility of wind turbine syndrome attracts the interest of more people who really understand how sound affects health, perhaps we'll get a clearer picture of whether there's any truth to it, or not.

Source: http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2013/04/02/175468025/could-wind-turbines-be-toxic-to-the-ear?ft=1&f=1007

Meteor Hits Russia Dorner Manifesto Valentines Day Quotes nerlens noel Mark Balelo Anne Stringfield paczki

A Swingers Cruise And The Necessity For Travel Insurance

One of the great ways to take a vacation is a cruise. There are many different vacations available, no matter what type of lifestyle you lead. We cater to all types, whether you are a nudist, straight, gay, or a swinger. A swingers cruise specializes in making sure that the travel experience is of the highest quality for both couples who desire to expand their sexuality and those who just want a highly sexual environment that is pressure free.

These types of adventures can be enjoyed either by booking a whole ship for yourselves or for your group, or by reserving a block of cabins or decks on a major cruise ship. However, for the ultimate privacy experience, the best way to live the alternate lifestyle on vacation is to have the entire ship to yourselves. This offers you couples of various ages, appearance, and walk of life to have new experiences with. These cruises offer parties by the pool, dances, sensual entertainment, and private rooms to play in an environment that allows you to live out your fantasies.

One of the things that you need to look for when planning your swingers cruise is that you get a good price. Because you typically only get to enjoy one vacation per calendar year, you want to make sure that you are booking it with a well respected agency so that you will have the best experience possible.

Another thing that you need to look for when booking a trip is a guarantee. You want to book with a company that promises to search other cruise companies to compare rates to make sure that they are giving you the best rate on the market. Sometimes they will beat the price of an advertisement that you bring in to the booking agency, or will offer you better deals if you become a member of their travel club.

Some booking agencies suggest that you get travel insurance to cover your trip when you are making your initial travel reservations. Because things happen unexpectedly, if you need to cancel your trip, travel insurance will cover any losses that you may incur due to the death of a family member, some type of injury to your person, or natural disaster that prevents you from embarking or completing your travel plans. Most travel companies do suggest that you purchase the insurance, and that you get it at least 30 days before your travel begins. You don't want to regret and be out of all the money that you spent for not planning ahead.

If you are one who participates in an alternate lifestyle and wants to experience a swingers cruise, there are several available options for you. Just follow the simple guidelines, while making sure that your insurances are up to date and you will have the time of your life while making memories for years to come.

About the Author:
If you are interested in participating in a swingers cruise, there are many great opportunities awaiting you. Visit http://couplescruise.com for more information.

Source: http://www.articlesnatch.com/Article/A-Swingers-Cruise-And-The-Necessity-For-Travel-Insurance/4517669

Arnold Palmer Invitational 2013 arnold palmer invitational Chinua Achebe The Croods ashley greene marquette university Chris Porco

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Hack a Bluetooth Remote Control Into Old Speakers

Hack a Bluetooth Remote Control Into Old SpeakersHack a Bluetooth Remote Control Into Old Speakers If you have an old set of speakers sitting around in need of a modern touch, DIYer Andrzej shows off how to add a Bluetooth remote control into an old set of PC speakers.

The process uses some old Creative speakers, an ATmega, a cheap Bluetooth module, and a few other bits of hardware to control how the volume is adjusted. It ends up being a complicated little hack that requires a bit of soldering, but if you don't want to spend money on retail solutions this is certainly one way to do it. Head over to EmerytHacks for the full guide.

Adding Bluetooth remote control to computer speakers | EmerytHacks via Hack a Day

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/OYwRyLxCkjw/hack-a-bluetooth-remote-control-into-old-speakers

Safe Haven Robbie Rogers WWE Rita Ora Meteor Russia jay z Oscar Pistorius

Lapse in Worker's Comp Insurance Denies Death Benefits to Family ...

By Farah & Farah on April 1, 2013

The Flagler County workers? compensation attorneys at Farah & Farah have learned about the tragic case of a family fighting to raise the funds to bury a family member who was slain at a nail salon. The surviving family would have been eligible for up to $7,500 in death benefits and up to $150,000 in additional payment through workers? compensation ? if the employer had not let his workers? compensation insurance lapse.

The family is now grieving and facing an uncertain future due to the alleged negligence of the nail salon owner.

The Flagler County Sheriff?s Department is still trying to piece together why a gunman walked into the nail salon, gunned down the 32-year-old mother of six, and then simply walked out. It appears that robbery was not a motive and detectives are investigating whether the crime was a hit.

According to an investigator from the Florida Division of Workers? Compensation Compliance, the owner?s workers? compensation insurance was cancelled a month before the shooting. The owner claims he sent a check to his insurance agency on Feb. 15 to have the policy re-instated. The agency claims it received no payment and that the owner had a ?history of prior cancellation.?

A ?stop work? order was filed on the business, and was rescinded after the owner paid a $1,000 fine. It is unclear whether the owner?s workers? compensation insurance has been re-instated. So far, no arrests have been made for the murder and the owner of the Mobil Mart has not yet been charged with workers? compensation fraud.

Sadly, FlaglerLive.com reports that an agent with the owner?s insurance agency told an investigator that given the circumstances of the workplace death, payments would have been made to the family if the policy had been in effect.

Under most circumstances, it is an employer?s responsibility, by law, to have workers? compensation coverage for his or her employees. Unfortunately, not all employers obey the law, which can leave workers and their families vulnerable when facing funeral costs or meeting everyday living expenses. If you have questions about your rights under workers? compensation law, call Farah & Farah at (800) 670-8815 or contact us online. We want to help you and your loved ones.

Source: http://www.florida-workerscomp.com/blog/workers-comp-claim-denial/lapse-workers-comp-insurance-denies-death-benefits-family/

nflx chicago blackhawks giuliana rancic giuliana rancic elie wiesel temptations work hard play hard

3 Ways Work Visas Could Still Blow Up the Immigration Bill

Let?s start with the positive viewpoint. Big labor (i.e., the AFL-CIO) has agreed, for the first time in its history, to accept a new foreign-worker program for low-skilled jobs, including in construction, food service, and janitorial work?in many ways the mainstay of union membership.

The new foreign-worker program is considered an essential component of an immigration bill by business groups and Republicans. Without it, there is no immigration reform, as Republicans made plain last week when they went home for a spring break without a deal in place on "future flow."

Lobbying negotiators made some progress after that. The AFL-CIO publicized its understanding of the ?agreement in principle? with business groups over the weekend. It included wage rates for the new foreign workers that business groups actually like: They will pay the same wage as a similarly situated American worker or the Labor Department's "prevailing wage" for that occupational classification. So far so good.

"We have created a new model, a modern visa system, that includes both a bureau to collect and analyze labor market data, as well as significant worker protections,? said AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka in a statement.

Then came the harder part. Business groups were not willing to sign off as quickly and publicly as Trumka did. (The trust level between the two sides is low.) Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., a key Senate negotiator, made sure to walk back from news of the deal on Sunday, saying that reports of an agreement on work visas were premature.

The new W Visa Program under discussion would be part of a sweeping immigration overhaul expected to be on the Senate floor in a month or two. The legislation allowing visa waivers would also give legal status to some 11 million undocumented immigrants currently in the United States.

The ?future flow? of foreign workers has always lurked in the background as the ogre that could kill the deal. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., insists that the four Republicans and Democrats negotiating the bill are on track to produce a draft next week for consideration by the Judiciary Committee. There is no reason to think he is wrong, but the last-minute haggling over details has everyone involved in the talks sweating, and probably cursing.

Now, here?s the negative viewpoint?three ways the back-and-forth over work visas could blow up the immigration deal:

1. The Numbers Don?t Match. The AFL-CIO has agreed to allow 20,000 foreign workers into the country by 2015. (That?s up from 10,000 in an offer made last week.) By 2019, the numbers would go up to 75,000. That?s not nearly enough, from businesses? perspective, to respond to the need. For the past 10 years, illegal immigrants have come into the country to fill these low-skilled jobs at the rate of about 350,000 a year?almost 700,000 in the 2007 economic boom and at about 165,000 in 2011, at the height of the recession.

The whole idea behind the W visa is to replace the illegal population with a legal one. Most of the current illegal population already works in the low-skilled jobs, such as hotel-room cleaning or dishwashing, that would be covered by the W visa. But immigration experts say you can?t expect the current workforce to remain static. The undocumented workers now will not fill future workforce needs.

The prospect of 75,000 visas available seven years from now is not enough to appease business groups or Republicans. Unless labor and business can start talking remotely in the same ballpark, the deal is finished. The AFL-CIO is willing to endorse 200,000 visas per year at some point in the future. That is close to what business groups say they need in terms of numbers, but not in terms of timing.

?It?s a huge breakthrough that there is bipartisan agreement that we need a program like this. The problem is, it?s too small,? said ImmigrationWorks USA President Tamar Jacoby. ?If there is a deal, let?s hope we can fix it going forward.?

2. Gaming the Economic Model. Negotiators' ultimate goal is to come up with a system in which the foreign workforce will respond to economic need. If the U.S. unemployment rate goes up, the number of available foreign work visas goes down. Alternatively, if the unemployment rate in a particular job sector is high, the price of a foreign work visa for that same job could go up.

The concept is easy. The execution is not. The basic idea, as outlined by AFL-CIO and business lobbyists involved in the talks, is some type of government commission staffed by labor experts and economists that would identify labor shortages and make recommendations as to the number of work visas that would be available in any given year.

Such a system could certainly work in theory, but there are lots of ways the measurements could run askew and make the annual visa caps as arbitrary as they are now. First, the Bureau of Labor Statistics doesn?t have the finely parsed, regional industry-sector unemployment numbers that would make for a truly useful analysis. Any reliance on unemployment data paints only a broad portrait of the employment situation. Guiding the immigration system based on such numbers would be like steering a Porche with water balloons.

Second, unemployment numbers are lagging economic indicators, reflecting the past and not the future. Overuse of that data would mean that the people charged with making recommendations could find themselves months behind the actual economic need.

Finally, it matters who is in charge. Under the AFL-CIO?s outline, the person running the ?Bureau of Immigration and Market Research? would be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Remember Consumer Financial Protection Board fights? That will be nothing compared with this.

3. Unemployment Is No Joke. The argument against the new visa-waiver program is that Americans don't have jobs. The national unemployment rate is at 7.7 percent. In construction, the rate is nearly double, at 15.8 percent. Construction is also where many undocumented immigrants happen to be employed.

Lawmakers who want to stop the immigration overhaul from happening are fond of saying that there are 11 million Americans out of work now who would be happy to have a fruit-picking or roofing job. It?s an effective argument, particularly for conservative politicians representing blue-collar districts or populist politicians representing labor-friendly districts. Notably, it?s not something you hear from anyone actually involved in crafting the legislation. But eventually, those lawmakers will have to sell this bill to their colleagues who worry about such things.

The argument in favor of the new visa program is best articulated in terms of what happened without one under the 1986 amnesty signed by President Reagan. Once the 3 million newly legalized immigrants moved on to bigger and better things, a new group of illegal immigrants swarmed to the United States to fill those empty, crummy jobs. Now we have 11 million illegal immigrants. But that doesn't make the unemployed American feel any better.

We?ll end on some good news, for what it?s worth. The "path to citizenship" for illegal immigrants appears to be resolving itself, as Republicans are repeatedly being assured that the unauthorized workforce will not get any ?special? treatment other than the ability to work and live here without fear of deportation. It?s a path to citizenship, but it will be no different than the path that any other law-abiding immigrant would take. And the illegal guys have to go last.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/3-ways-visas-could-still-blow-immigration-bill-075512795--politics.html

peter frampton Sandy Hook Elementary School Colors Cassadee Pope Victoria Soto nbc sports morgan freeman westboro baptist church

Monday, April 1, 2013

Ericsson T28z review

Ericsson T28z review

When Ericsson launched the T28 in 1999, it was the lightest and slimmest phone on the market. It was also the first handset ever to use a lithium polymer battery. The T28 was a premium device -- Ericsson described it as "designer technology", and it was successful with business executives before the Blackberry became popular. Unlike its bar-shaped competitors, the T28 was immediately recognizable by its signature antenna stub and "active flip" keypad cover. Ericsson packed the phone with state-of-the-art features like voice dialing and an optional Bluetooth dongle. It came in three versions: T28s (GSM 1800 / 900), T28z (GSM 1900) and T28 World (GSM 1900/900). Our T28z review unit started life on VoiceStream (eventually acquired by T-Mobile). How does this classic handset stack up to our modern pocketable computers? Find out after the break.

Filed under: ,

Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/01/ericsson-t28z-review/

lupe fiasco jason wu jason wu Mavericks Surf Stonewall Inaugural Ball julio jones

Ariz. won't change tune on gay marriage, despite his gay son

A Republican congressman from Arizona told a local news station that his son's sexual orientation hasn't changed his view that same-sex couples should not be allowed to marry.

Rep. Matt Salmon, from Arizona's 5th Congressional District, told 3TV that he loves his son and does not believe he chose to be gay, but that he has not "evolved" to the position that his son should be allowed to marry someone of the same sex.

"I don't support the gay marriage," Salmon says in the clip. "My son is by far one of the most important people in my life. I love him more than I can say. I'm just not there as far as believing in my heart that we should change 2,000 years of social policy in favor of a redefinition of the family. I'm not there.

"It doesn't mean that I don't have respect," he continued. "It doesn't mean that I don't sympathize with some of the issues. It just means I haven't evolved to that station."

Last week, Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio became the most prominent Republican politician to announce his support for same-sex marriage. He wrote in an op-ed that he changed his strong stance against gay marriage after his son came out as gay to Portman and his wife, when he was a college freshman two years ago. "Knowing that my son is gay prompted me to consider the issue from another perspective: that of a dad who wants all three of his kids to lead happy, meaningful lives with the people they love, a blessing Jane and I have shared for 26 years," he wrote.

The Supreme Court heard arguments in two cases last week that could pave the way for the legalization of same-sex marriage in California and other states. Their decisions aren't expected until June.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/arizona-congressman-gay-son-doesn-t-change-position-191347768--election.html

kellie pickler USA VS Mexico Alexis DeJoria Marshall Henderson Tubby Smith Elena Delle Donne Marriage Equality